Review a K-1 fight with the ruleset in view.
K-1 review needs more than a generic strike counter. WarriorIQ keeps punches, kicks and permitted knee actions in the selected ruleset context while suppressing unsupported contact and scoring claims.
Ruleset-aware evidence
Select K-1 before analysis so legality checks and report wording use the correct style. The event promoter or federation remains the authority for the exact rules used in a particular bout.
- Separate fighter attribution
- Outcome labels only when supported
- Round and interruption context
- Illegal-action review kept separate from supported scoring evidence
A replay your coach can use
Supported moments link back to the contact time and replay begins just before the event, giving the coach enough context to see the setup, defensive response and exit.
Honest limits
A high tracking percentage is observation coverage, not proof that every action label is correct. WarriorIQ shows the difference and withholds a score when the available evidence is not strong enough.
Useful answers before analysis
Does the analysis replace a K-1 judge?
No. It is a training and video-review tool, not an official judging system.
What camera angle works best?
Use a stable, elevated ringside angle that keeps both fighters fully visible with minimal obstruction.
Bring one fight. Leave with a clearer next step.
Upload privately, select both fighters, and focus the detailed report on the athlete you want to improve.